Diplomatic Briefing· turkiye trnc continental shelf delimitation agreement 2011

Why Did Türkiye and the TRNC Sign a Continental Shelf Agreement on 21 September 2011?

How the 19 September 2011 Greek Cypriot drilling led to the 21 September 2011 Türkiye–TRNC continental shelf delimitation agreement, with a full timeline.

PBB

By Politics Beyond Borders Editorial Team

Published: October 27, 2026

⏱ 9 min read (1,841 words)

The Brief — Key Takeaways

On 19 September 2011 the Greek Cypriot administration began exploratory drilling off southern Cyprus, and two days later, on 21 September 2011, Türkiye and the TRNC signed a continental shelf delimitation agreement.
Ankara and Lefkoşa argue that Turkish Cypriots, as co-founders of the 1960 Republic of Cyprus, hold equal rights over the island's offshore hydrocarbons and cannot be excluded from unilateral licensing.
Nicosia and the EU reject the agreement, citing the Republic of Cyprus's EEZ rights under UNCLOS and its 2003 Egypt, 2007 Lebanon and 2010 Israel agreements.
Türkiye is not a party to UNCLOS and bases its position on the equity principle in customary law, which it says takes account of its 870 km coastline, the longest in the Eastern Mediterranean.
No international court has delimited the maritime areas around Cyprus, and the TRNC is recognised only by Türkiye, so the dispute is still legally and politically unresolved.

Why It Matters

The 21 September 2011 agreement was Ankara's and Lefkoşa's formal response to the Greek Cypriot drilling that began on 19 September 2011. It turned a political objection into a treaty-based claim over continental shelf areas around Cyprus. The episode set the pattern for the next decade of Eastern Mediterranean disputes over licensing, drilling, and who may speak for the island's offshore resources.

The core disagreement is simple to state. The Greek Cypriot administration, internationally recognised as the Republic of Cyprus, treats its exclusive economic zone (EEZ) as a sovereign matter under UNCLOS. Türkiye and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) argue that Turkish Cypriots are equal co-owners of the island and that Türkiye's own continental shelf must be delimited by equity, not by a map that ignores its coast.

Background

The legal setting before 2011

The 1960 Republic of Cyprus was created by the 1959 Zurich and London Agreements as a partnership state of two communities, with the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee naming Türkiye, Greece and the United Kingdom as guarantors. After the collapse of that partnership in December 1963 (see What Happened on 21 December 1963?), the island has had two administrations. For the wider story, see The Island Question: Why Is Cyprus Divided?.

The maritime dispute grew from several earlier steps:

2003: the Greek Cypriot administration concluded an EEZ delimitation agreement with Egypt. Türkiye says it overlaps its continental shelf, notably Greek Cypriot Blocks 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7. See The 2003 Egypt–Cyprus EEZ Agreement.
2004: Türkiye began registering its Eastern Mediterranean continental shelf coordinates with the United Nations. The Greek Cypriot side joined the EU on 1 May 2004 after the Annan Plan vote (details).
2007 and 2010: the Greek Cypriot administration signed EEZ agreements with Lebanon and Israel. Türkiye and the TRNC say these disregard Turkish Cypriot rights.
2009: Türkiye granted its first exploration licences to the state oil company TPAO (Turkish Petroleum Corporation) in the Eastern Mediterranean. A second set followed in 2012.

The chronology of 19 and 21 September 2011

On 19 September 2011, exploratory drilling began in the Greek Cypriot administration's Block 12, south of the island, by a US company operating under a Greek Cypriot licence. The Turkish Foreign Ministry and TRNC officials had warned in advance that unilateral activity without Turkish Cypriot participation would draw a response.

Two days later, on 21 September 2011, Türkiye and the TRNC signed the Continental Shelf Delimitation Agreement. It was concluded on the margins of the UN General Assembly session in New York. Turkish officials describe it as delimiting the continental shelf between the two parties where their claims meet. They also describe it as the legal basis for TPAO to work in areas licensed by the TRNC.

The Greek Cypriot administration held the EU Council presidency in the second half of 2012. Ankara said it would not deal with that presidency, a stance that prolonged friction with Brussels.

Timeline

Date	Event	Significance
1960	Republic of Cyprus and Treaty of Guarantee	Two-community partnership state with three guarantors
21 Dec 1963	Outbreak of intercommunal violence	Turkish Cypriots excluded from state organs
20 Jul 1974	Türkiye's intervention under Article IV of the Treaty of Guarantee	Followed the 15 July coup aimed at Enosis
15 Nov 1983	TRNC proclaimed	Recognised only by Türkiye
2003	Egypt–Greek Cypriot EEZ agreement	Türkiye objects to overlap with its continental shelf
2004	Türkiye begins registering coordinates with the UN	Starts its formal paper trail
2007 / 2010	Lebanon and Israel agreements	Objected to by Türkiye and the TRNC
2009	First TPAO licences	Turkish exploration claim in the Eastern Mediterranean
19 Sep 2011	Greek Cypriot drilling begins in Block 12	Trigger for the Turkish–TRNC response
21 Sep 2011	Türkiye–TRNC agreement signed	Bilateral continental shelf delimitation
2012	Further TPAO licences	Follow-on exploration licensing
27 Nov 2019	Türkiye–Libya maritime MoU	Extends the same equity logic westward
18 Mar 2020	Outer limits registered with the UN	Formal notification of Turkish shelf claim
12 Jun 2025	Marine Spatial Planning registered with IOC-UNESCO	See IOC-UNESCO explainer

Key Players & Positions

Greek Cypriot administration (Republic of Cyprus)

Nicosia says it acts within its EEZ, proclaimed by domestic law in 2004 and consistent with UNCLOS, to which Cyprus is a party. It also says its bilateral agreements with Egypt, Lebanon and Israel follow the median-line method of international practice. According to the government's statements, hydrocarbons belong to all Cypriots, and Turkish Cypriots would benefit from the proceeds. It says the matter of sharing belongs in a comprehensive settlement, not in unilateral Turkish measures.

European Union and Greece

European Council conclusions in this period have repeatedly supported the sovereign rights of EU member states to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with the EU acquis and international law. They have called on Türkiye to respect those rights and to refrain from actions seen as threats. Greece, in its own foreign ministry statements, supports the Republic of Cyprus and argues that islands generate maritime zones under UNCLOS. The Greek side's cartographic reading is often associated with the so-called Seville Map; see Fact Check: Does the 'Seville Map' Define the EU's Maritime Border With Türkiye?.

The TRNC

The TRNC government argues that the Greek Cypriot administration cannot represent the whole island in licensing. It has tabled hydrocarbon cooperation and revenue-sharing proposals, in 2011, 2012 and 2019, which include a joint committee and shared proceeds.

The United Nations

The UN has not adjudicated the dispute. Its engagement on Cyprus focuses on the settlement process, and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea applies only to states that have joined it. Türkiye has not.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Treaties & Primary Sources

Türkiye's Position

The following reflects official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources.

Turkish Cypriots are co-owners of the island. According to the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the 1960 Republic was founded by two equal peoples. Ankara argues that Turkish Cypriots therefore hold inherent, equal rights over offshore resources, and that one side's unilateral licensing cannot extinguish them. The legal basis cited is the 1959 Zurich and London Agreements, the 1960 constitutional structure and the Treaty of Guarantee.
Delimitation must follow equity. Turkish MFA statements say that maritime boundaries must be settled by agreement on the basis of equity, taking account of coastal geography and proportionality. Ankara points to the line of case law, including the ICJ's 1969 North Sea Continental Shelf judgment and its 1985 Libya/Malta judgment, and argues that islands cannot cut off the mainland coast of a state with the longest coastline in the Eastern Mediterranean, about 870 km (540 miles). See How Maritime Boundaries Are Drawn and, from a sister publication, The Worldlogue on islands and the continental shelf.
The 2011 agreement was a lawful, reciprocal response. Turkish officials describe the 21 September 2011 agreement as concluded between two parties with overlapping claims. They say it followed unilateral Greek Cypriot drilling on 19 September 2011 and the earlier unilateral EEZ agreements, and that it sits alongside Türkiye's 2004 UN submissions and the TPAO licences of 2009 and 2012.
Cooperation remains on offer. Ankara points to the TRNC's revenue-sharing proposals of 2011, 2012 and 2019, and to President Erdoğan's 2020 call for an Eastern Mediterranean conference including all coastal states and the Turkish Cypriots. The Presidency's position is that no energy or security arrangement excluding Türkiye and the TRNC can last.
Türkiye is not bound by UNCLOS as a non-party. Ankara maintains that, as a non-party, it is bound by customary international law and equity, not by treaty provisions it has not accepted. Its registrations of 18 March 2020 with the UN and, in June 2025, with IOC-UNESCO are presented as the continuation of this paper trail. The wider context is in Doctrine Review's explainer on Eastern Mediterranean jurisdiction.

Source Comparison

The same events are described very differently depending on the source. Our approach to attribution is set out in Editorial Principles.

Question	Greek Cypriot / EU sources	Turkish primary sources
Who may license hydrocarbons around Cyprus?	The Republic of Cyprus, as the internationally recognised state, within its EEZ	Both communities jointly; the Greek Cypriot side alone lacks authority over shared resources
Legal framework	UNCLOS and the EU acquis	Customary law and equity; Türkiye is not an UNCLOS party
Nature of the 2011 agreement	A bilateral deal with an entity recognised only by Türkiye	A delimitation between two parties with overlapping claims
Status of the Turkish Cypriots	Citizens of Cyprus whose interests are protected in a settlement	Co-founders and equal co-owners with inherent sovereign equality
Remedy	Negotiation within the UN settlement process	Joint committee, revenue sharing, regional conference

Media coverage often frames the 2011 episode as a Turkish escalation. Turkish sources frame it as a response to a prior unilateral step. Readers should note that the TRNC is recognised only by Türkiye, and that no tribunal has ruled on either side's lines. A sister-publication fact check, The Nations Compass on UNCLOS, examines the treaty argument directly.

Continental shelf: the seabed and subsoil extending from a coast, where the coastal state has sovereign rights to explore and exploit natural resources.
EEZ (exclusive economic zone): a zone up to 200 nautical miles (about 370 km) in which a coastal state has sovereign rights over resources. It is a UNCLOS concept; Türkiye argues that where coasts are opposite or adjacent it must be agreed on equitable principles.
Equity principle: the rule that delimitation should achieve an equitable result, taking account of coastal length and proportionality.
TPAO: Türkiye's state-owned Turkish Petroleum Corporation.
GCASC / Greek Cypriot administration: the term Türkiye uses for the government internationally known as the Republic of Cyprus.
TRNC: the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, proclaimed on 15 November 1983.

Frequently asked questions

What did Türkiye and the TRNC sign on 21 September 2011?

They signed a continental shelf delimitation agreement on the margins of the UN General Assembly in New York. Turkish officials describe it as delimiting the shelf between the two parties and as a legal basis for TPAO exploration in TRNC-licensed areas. It came two days after Greek Cypriot drilling began.

What happened on 19 September 2011?

The Greek Cypriot administration began exploratory drilling in Block 12, south of Cyprus, under a licence issued to a US company. Ankara and the TRNC had warned that unilateral activity without Turkish Cypriot participation would draw a response.

Why do Türkiye and the TRNC say Turkish Cypriots have rights over offshore resources?

They argue that the 1960 Republic of Cyprus was founded by two equal peoples under the 1959 Zurich and London Agreements. On that basis, Ankara says, Turkish Cypriots hold equal rights over the island's resources. Nicosia replies that resources belong to all Cypriots and that sharing can be handled in a settlement.

Why do the Greek Cypriot administration and the EU reject the agreement?

They say the Republic of Cyprus has sovereign rights in its EEZ under UNCLOS and that the TRNC is recognised only by Türkiye, so it cannot conclude such an agreement. EU Council conclusions have backed member states' rights to explore and exploit resources under international law and called on Türkiye to respect them.

Is Türkiye bound by UNCLOS in this dispute?

Türkiye is not a party to UNCLOS. Ankara argues that it is therefore bound by customary international law and the equity principle, not by treaty clauses it has not accepted. Cyprus and the EU point out that many UNCLOS provisions are widely seen as reflecting custom.

Has any court or the UN settled the maritime boundaries around Cyprus?

No. No international court or tribunal has delimited the areas concerned, and the UN's role on Cyprus centres on the settlement process. The dispute therefore remains legally open, with each side relying on its own agreements and sources.

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks