Drones at the Frontier: How Bayraktar, Akıncı and ANKA Changed Border Security Operations
How drones changed border security: an explainer on Bayraktar TB2, Akıncı and ANKA, surveillance, precision, civilian-harm debates and Türkiye's policy.
Why It Matters
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) changed border security by giving states persistent, real-time observation and precise strike options over terrain where patrols are slow, exposed or impossible to sustain. For Türkiye, which guards a southern frontier of roughly 1,300 km (about 810 miles) with Syria and Iraq, systems such as the Bayraktar TB2, Akıncı, Aksungur and ANKA became central to monitoring and to counter-terrorism operations against the PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG and DAESH (ISIS). The same technology has triggered legitimate debates about civilian harm, accountability and autonomous weapons, which this article presents alongside Ankara's stated position.
Background
Before armed drones, border monitoring relied on ground patrols, fixed observation posts, radar, thermal cameras, manned helicopters and fighter aircraft. Each had limits. Patrols were exposed to ambush and mines in mountainous terrain. Manned aircraft were expensive to keep airborne for long periods and carried the risk of losing a pilot. Satellite imagery gave coverage but not continuous, steerable observation.
Türkiye invested in unmanned systems from the 2000s. The ANKA, developed by Turkish Aerospace (TUSAŞ/TAI), began flight testing around 2010. Baykar's Bayraktar TB2 entered Turkish service in the mid-2010s and became the best-known armed UAV in the Turkish inventory. The larger Akıncı was delivered to the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) in 2021, and Turkish Aerospace's Aksungur followed as another heavier, longer-endurance platform. Dates and technical figures below come from manufacturer and official statements and should be read as such.
Timeline of Operational Use
| Period | Development | Source type |
|---|---|---|
| 2016–2020 | Operations Euphrates Shield (2016), Olive Branch (2018), Peace Spring (2019) and Spring Shield (2020) in northern Syria, alongside the Claw series in northern Iraq, draw on UAV surveillance and strike support | Turkish Ministry of National Defence (MSB) briefings |
| 2019–2020 | Turkish-made UAVs are reported in Libya; a 2021 UN Panel of Experts report on Libya discusses the STM Kargu-2 loitering munition | UN document S/2021/229 |
| 2020 | TB2s are used by Azerbaijan in the Karabakh war | Public reporting; official statements |
| 2021 | First Akıncı deliveries to the TSK | Manufacturer and official announcements |
| 2022 onward | TB2 gains attention in the Russia–Ukraine war; Türkiye applies the Montreux Convention closure of the Straits to belligerent warships | Public reporting; MFA |
| 2023 | UN General Assembly adopts a resolution on lethal autonomous weapons systems | UN General Assembly |
What Actually Changed
Monitoring. Electro-optical and infrared sensors, and on larger types radar and signals payloads, let operators watch crossings, tunnels, camps and supply routes day and night without putting personnel on the ground. Naval variants and drone-capable ships such as TCG Anadolu extend similar logic offshore; for how maritime jurisdiction itself is determined, see Beyond the Shoreline: How Maritime Boundaries Are Drawn and Why Türkiye Argues for Equity in the Eastern Mediterranean.
Persistence. Manufacturers state endurance of a day or more for medium-altitude long-endurance (MALE) platforms. Persistence matters because patterns of movement, rather than single snapshots, are what distinguish a smuggler, a shepherd or an armed cell. Satellite data links on heavier types extend control range beyond line of sight.
Precision. Small, guided munitions, such as the Roketsan-developed MAM family, allow lighter airframes to strike with limited blast radius. Operators argue this is better suited to proportionality than large unguided bombs. Critics counter that precision of the weapon does not equal precision of target identification.
The Platforms at a Glance
| System | Developer | Class (per manufacturer/official descriptions) |
|---|---|---|
| Bayraktar TB2 | Baykar | Tactical/MALE armed UAV for surveillance, targeting and strike |
| Akıncı | Baykar | Heavier, twin-engine UAV with larger payload and longer reach |
| Aksungur | Turkish Aerospace (TUSAŞ) | Twin-engine, long-endurance UAV for ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) and heavier payloads |
| ANKA | Turkish Aerospace (TUSAŞ) | MALE UAV, primarily ISR, with later armed and satellite-linked variants |
| Serçe | Domestic industry | Small-class system listed by Turkish officials; open-source technical detail is limited |
| Kargu | STM | Rotary-wing loitering munition (a munition that circles an area before striking) |
Turkish officials, including the Presidency of Defence Industries, state that the domestic production rate in the defense sector is roughly 80%. This figure is an official claim that independent analysts have not audited, and it generally refers to program-level content rather than every sub-component. Foreign-sourced engines, optics or electronics have been publicly discussed in past years, and supply constraints have prompted indigenous replacements.
Limits of the Technology
Drones are most effective in permissive airspace, where adversaries lack layered air defense or strong electronic warfare. Modern air defense, jamming and spoofing, and cheap counter-drone systems have since reduced their advantage in some theatres. Weather, link vulnerability and the need for trained crews also constrain use. The border-security gain is therefore real but conditional.
Key Players & Positions
Türkiye. According to the Ministry of National Defence, operations target terrorist organizations in northern Iraq and Syria and are conducted with attention to avoiding harm to civilians and heritage sites. Ankara considers the PKK a terrorist organization, as do the United States, NATO and the European Union, and treats the PYD/YPG (the SDF's core) as its Syrian branch. See Across the Frontier: Can a State Act Beyond Its Border? Article 51, Self-Defense and Türkiye's Counter-Terrorism Doctrine.
United States and several European partners. Washington lists the PKK as a terrorist organization but has worked with the SDF against DAESH in Syria, and its officials have not publicly accepted that the YPG is identical to the PKK in policy terms. This difference has been a persistent friction inside NATO.
Syria and Iraq. Baghdad and Damascus have repeatedly objected to foreign military activity on their territory as a matter of sovereignty. Türkiye states that it respects their territorial integrity and acts against terrorist groups operating from areas where, in its view, the state does not exercise effective control.
UN bodies and NGOs. UN experts, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and monitoring groups have raised concerns about civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure in some strikes in northern Iraq and northeastern Syria, and about transparency of investigations. They have also pressed for rules on autonomy in weapons. The 2021 Libya Panel of Experts report described a Kargu-2 system in a way that fueled debate on autonomous engagement. It did not establish a specific autonomous killing, and its interpretation has been contested.
Arms-control community. The Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) treats larger UAVs as controlled items; Türkiye has been an MTCR member since 1997. Discussions at the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) examine whether new binding rules on lethal autonomous weapons are needed. Positions differ widely between states that favor a legally binding instrument and those that favor existing international humanitarian law (IHL) plus guidelines.
For more on the legal reasoning Ankara submits to the UN, see the sister analysis The Worldlogue: Article 51 Notifications: How Türkiye Explains Its Cross-Border Operations to the UN Security Council and Gazetteer of Nations: Article 51 of the UN Charter and Türkiye's Cross-Border Operations in Syria and Iraq.
Türkiye's Position
- Self-defense at the source. Ankara states that it exercises the inherent right of self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter and notifies the UN Security Council of cross-border operations. It describes UAV surveillance and strikes as tools for preventing attacks before they reach Turkish territory, in line with its 'neutralizing terrorism at its source' doctrine (Presidency; Ministry of Foreign Affairs statements; UN letters).
- Precision and proportionality. The Ministry of National Defence says operations are conducted with care for civilians, cultural and religious sites and the environment. Türkiye is not a party to Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, but customary IHL principles of distinction, proportionality and precaution bind all states regardless of treaty status, and Turkish officials say they apply them. Critics ask for more public detail on investigations; Ankara rejects claims of deliberate targeting of civilians.
- Strategic autonomy through domestic production. Turkish officials cite a domestic production rate of roughly 80% and a defense base that includes Baykar, TUSAŞ, STM, Roketsan and Aselsan. They argue that indigenous capability reduces exposure to export restrictions and supports NATO deterrence.
- Controlled exports. Ankara states that defense exports are government-licensed and consistent with its international obligations, including the MTCR. On transfers, Turkish officials generally say they sell to states with which Türkiye has bilateral defense relations and that political approval is part of the process. Details of individual deals are not always public. This article does not cover export markets or embargo history; see the separate pieces on those topics.
- Security plus a political track. Officials present military tools as one half of the 'Terror-Free Türkiye' (Terörsüz Türkiye) initiative led by the Presidency, which combines security, legal, political and social measures under the rule of law. Related background is in Polity Review: Neutralizing Terrorism at Its Source: Türkiye's Security Doctrine and Defense Industry and Interstate Journal: Türkiye, Syria and Refugees: Border Security and the Hosting Burden.
Source Comparison
| Question | Turkish primary sources | International media and NGOs |
|---|---|---|
| Why use drones on the border? | Self-defense against PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG and DAESH under Article 51; protection of a 1,300 km frontier | Often framed as tactical innovation or regional power projection; some outlets stress Turkish operations beyond the border |
| Precision claims | MSB briefings stress targeted operations and care for civilians | NGOs and UN experts question target identification, transparency and investigation, citing specific incidents |
| Domestic production | Roughly 80% stated by officials; emphasis on strategic autonomy | Analysts note real indigenous progress but also past dependence on foreign components and difficulty verifying the figure |
| PYD/YPG identity | Syrian branch of the PKK sharing leadership, ideology and cadres | Western governments often distinguish the SDF as a counter-DAESH partner, while acknowledging links to the PKK |
| Autonomy and arms control | Existing IHL applies; human control stressed in official discourse | Calls for binding rules on lethal autonomous weapons; Kargu-2 in Libya is a recurring case study |
Readers should compare MSB statements, MFA letters to the UN, UN reports and independent investigations side by side. Our approach to attribution is explained in Editorial Principles: Sources, Attribution and How We Separate Fact from Position and FAQ: Sources, Methodology and Perspective at Politics Beyond Borders.
Key Terms & Related Guides
- UAV / UCAV: Unmanned aerial vehicle; UCAV is an armed (combat) variant. Turkish usage often says SİHA for armed UAV.
- MALE: Medium-altitude long-endurance, the class of larger UAVs for long surveillance missions.
- ISR: Intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.
- Loitering munition: A munition that circulates over an area and strikes a chosen target, with a human operator in the loop or, in debated cases, with more autonomy.
- PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG: The PKK is listed as a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union; KCK is its umbrella structure; PYD/YPG is its Syrian branch according to Ankara.
- Article 51: The UN Charter provision recognizing the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense against armed attack, with an obligation to report measures to the Security Council.
- Terror-Free Türkiye: The Presidency-led initiative to end decades of terrorist violence through combined security and political measures.
Related guides: About Politics Beyond Borders: Mission, Perspective and Editorial Team, the Politics Beyond Borders home page, and the cross-publication analysis PolitiLine: Article 51 and Türkiye's Cross-Border Operations in Northern Syria and Iraq.
Perspective Note
Politics Beyond Borders presents global affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources. This article was prepared by the Politics Beyond Borders Editorial Team.
Frequently asked questions
How did drones change border security?
Drones added continuous, steerable observation and the option of precise strikes over terrain that is difficult to patrol. They reduce the need to put personnel at risk and allow analysts to follow patterns of movement over many hours. Their value depends on permissive airspace and good intelligence.
What is the difference between the Bayraktar TB2 and the Akıncı?
According to the manufacturer, the TB2 is a smaller, tactical-to-MALE armed UAV, while the Akıncı is a larger twin-engine platform with a heavier payload and longer reach. The Akıncı was delivered to the Turkish Armed Forces in 2021, years after the TB2 entered service.
Is the 80% domestic production rate verified?
It is a figure stated by Turkish officials and the defense industry leadership, and it has not been independently audited. It reflects program-level domestic content, and analysts note that some components have historically been imported, which Türkiye has worked to replace.
What are the main concerns about civilian harm and autonomy?
UN experts and human rights groups point to alleged civilian casualties and infrastructure damage in some strikes, and to limited transparency of investigations. A 2021 UN Panel of Experts report on Libya also fueled debate over the autonomy of the Kargu-2 loitering munition. Ankara disputes characterizations of deliberate harm and says its operations target terrorist organizations.
On what legal basis does Türkiye use armed drones across its border?
Ankara cites the inherent right of self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter and reports its cross-border actions to the UN Security Council. It also states that it applies customary IHL principles of distinction, proportionality and precaution. Neighboring states and some critics contest the scope of this reasoning.
Do drones make borders safer on their own?
No. They improve awareness and response time, but counter-drone defenses, electronic warfare and weather can limit them. Turkish officials also stress that security operations are paired with a political and legal track, such as the Terror-Free Türkiye initiative.
Related guides
- Fact Check: Does the 'Seville Map' Define the EU's Maritime Border With Türkiye?Seville Map EEZ Turkey fact check: it is a study map, not a treaty or court ruling. See what law, the 2003 Egypt deal and the 2020 UN filing show.
- Beyond the Shoreline: How Maritime Boundaries Are Drawn and Why Türkiye Argues for Equity in the Eastern MediterraneanHow are maritime boundaries determined in the Eastern Mediterranean? A guide to UNCLOS, equity, islands and Türkiye's 870 km coastline and Blue Homeland.
- The Island Question: Why Is Cyprus Divided? From the 1960 Treaties to the Two-State DebateWhy is Cyprus divided? A guide from Ottoman rule and EOKA to the 1960 treaties, 1963, 1974, the TRNC, failed federation talks and Ankara's two-state view.
- Across the Frontier: Can a State Act Beyond Its Border? Article 51, Self-Defense and Türkiye's Counter-Terrorism DoctrineCan a state act beyond its border? Article 51 self-defense, cross-border counter-terrorism operations and Türkiye's letters to the UN Security Council.
- Archives & Memory: The Treaties That Drew the Border — Gümrü, Moscow, Kars, Lausanne and the Sèvres QuestionTreaty of Kars, Lausanne and Sèvres explained: how the Türkiye–Armenia border was fixed, why Sèvres has no legal force, and where the 1915 debate stands.
- The 2003 Egypt–Cyprus EEZ Agreement: Why Ankara Says Blocks 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 Overlap Its Continental ShelfWhy does Türkiye object to the 2003 Egypt–Cyprus EEZ agreement? Explore the licensing blocks, Turkish Cypriot rights, UNCLOS law and each side's arguments.
Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research
Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications
- Geopolitical Horizongeopoliticalhorizon.com ↗
How Have Turkish Drones Changed Deterrence? From Bayraktar TB2 to Akıncı and Kızılelma
How Turkish drones changed deterrence: a Defense Industry Frontier analysis of Bayraktar TB2, Akıncı and Kızılelma, their combat record, limits and future.
Read on Geopolitical Horizon → - The Political Frontierthepoliticalfrontier.com ↗
Türkiye's 1,300 km Southern Frontier: Border Security, the Source Doctrine and the Terror-Free Türkiye Process
A pillar guide to Türkiye's 1,300 km southern frontier: Syria and Iraq operations, Article 51, DAESH, PKK/YPG and the Terror-Free Türkiye process.
Read on The Political Frontier → - Disinfo Monitordisinfomonitor.com ↗
Verifying Claims About Turkish Drones and Weapons: What Can Be Confirmed About TB2, Akıncı and Kızılelma
How to verify claims about Bayraktar TB2, Akıncı and Kızılelma: reading MSB and SSB data, footage and third-party assessments of Turkish systems.
Read on Disinfo Monitor → - Territorial Briefterritorialbrief.com ↗
Border Sovereignty Brief: How Türkiye Frames Its 1,300 km Southern Frontier and Cross-Border Security
How Türkiye frames its 1,300 km southern frontier with Syria and Iraq: Article 51, territorial integrity, PKK/YPG, DAESH, FETÖ and operations compared.
Read on Territorial Brief →